Trump Sanctions: Top US Law Firms Hesitant to Back Perkins Coie
The Trump administration’s sanctions on top law firms have sparked a divide in the legal community, with many firms hesitant to publicly challenge the executive orders. In a recent development, none of the top 20 law firms in the US have offered their “unconditional support” to an effort by Perkins Coie to fight the sanctions imposed by the Trump administration.
Amicus Brief Faces Challenges
Organizers of an amicus brief in support of Perkins Coie’s lawsuit are struggling to convince America’s most powerful law firms to sign up, amid concerns they will face retaliation by the Trump administration. According to emails seen by the Financial Times, 173 out of 248 firms that have responded to a survey are offering “unconditional support”. However, among the top 100 by revenue, only three have offered such support, with none coming from the top 20.
Law Firms Weigh Risks and Benefits
The brief is being prepared by the Los Angeles firm Munger, Tolles & Olson and is supposed to be submitted to the court in conjunction with Perkins Coie’s formal court papers. Eight firms in the top 100 have offered their support with conditions, including that their closest peers also sign the brief. Nearly all of the full-throated support so far for the amicus brief originates from small and medium-sized firms.
Trump Administration’s Sanctions
The Trump administration has imposed sanctions on several top law firms tied to the Democratic party or who have hired investigators who previously targeted President Donald Trump. Law firms have been struggling with the question of whether to publicly confront Trump’s campaign against the legal community or seek a détente in order to avoid business disruptions.
Conclusion
The reluctance of top US law firms to back Perkins Coie highlights the challenges faced by the legal community in responding to the Trump administration’s sanctions. As the situation continues to unfold, it remains to be seen how law firms will navigate the risks and benefits of publicly challenging the executive orders. With the rule of law at stake, the legal community must carefully consider its next steps.